Head-to-head comparison

BYD Tang vs Tesla Model X Dual Motor

Real-world energy use across 7 European routes, using identical inputs (2 passengers, light luggage, summer, full battery, normal driving). Differences are the route's terrain, the vehicle's consumption, and weight — nothing else.

Verdict

Tesla Model X Dual Motor wins 7/7 routes

Average difference: 32.06 kWh per trip.

Vehicle specifications

SpecBYD TangTesla Model X Dual Motor
Battery (usable)86.4 kWh95 kWh
WLTP range420 km572 km
Real-world consumption243 Wh/km196 Wh/km
Curb weight2001 kg2131 kg
Model year(s)20222023

Route-by-route comparison

RouteDistanceBYD TangTesla Model X Dual MotorWinnerΔ kWh
Madrid → Barcelona612 km160.3 kWh129.3 kWhB31.0
Madrid → Seville538 km142.5 kWh114.9 kWhB27.6
Paris → Lyon465 km118.9 kWh95.9 kWhB23.0
Berlin → Munich586 km152.1 kWh122.7 kWhB29.4
Rome → Milan583 km152.5 kWh123.0 kWhB29.5
Barcelona → Paris1031 km266.7 kWh215.1 kWhB51.6
Madrid → Lisbon634 km166.7 kWh134.4 kWhB32.3

Standardized inputs across all rows: 2 passengers, light luggage, summer, 100% starting battery, normal driving style. Your actual consumption will vary — calculate for your specific trip →

Compare these for your route.

Same calculator, your inputs. Add passengers, luggage, season, and starting battery for an accurate per-trip estimate.

Open the calculator →
Methodology

Every figure on this page comes from the same calculation engine that powers our homepage calculator — terrain-segmented consumption with weather and weight adjustments. See how it works and the exact formulas.

Inputs are held constant across both vehicles and every route: 2 passengers, light luggage, summer (June–August average temperatures along the corridor), 100% starting battery, normal driving style, no roof box or trailer, 0% battery degradation.

Last computed: 2026-06-17. Vehicle specs from the EVStrada catalog (manufacturer WLTP × 1.18 real-world calibration).