Head-to-head comparison

Audi Q8 e-tron 50 quattro vs Audi Sportbacketron 35

Real-world energy use across 6 European routes, using identical inputs (2 passengers, light luggage, summer, full battery, normal driving). Differences are the route's terrain, the vehicle's consumption, and weight — nothing else.

Verdict

Audi Sportbacketron 35 wins 6/6 routes

Average difference: 23.02 kWh per trip.

Vehicle specifications

SpecAudi Q8 e-tron 50 quattroAudi Sportbacketron 35
Battery (usable)89 kWh52 kWh
WLTP range502 km349 km
Real-world consumption209 Wh/km176 Wh/km
Curb weight2040 kg1483 kg
Model year(s)20222021

Route-by-route comparison

RouteDistanceAudi Q8 e-tron 50 quattroAudi Sportbacketron 35WinnerΔ kWh
Madrid → Barcelona612 km137.9 kWh116.1 kWhB21.8
Paris → Lyon465 km102.2 kWh86.1 kWhB16.1
Berlin → Munich586 km130.8 kWh110.1 kWhB20.7
Rome → Milan583 km131.2 kWh110.5 kWhB20.7
Barcelona → Paris1031 km229.4 kWh193.2 kWhB36.2
Madrid → Lisbon634 km143.3 kWh120.7 kWhB22.6

Standardized inputs across all rows: 2 passengers, light luggage, summer, 100% starting battery, normal driving style. Your actual consumption will vary — calculate for your specific trip →

Compare these for your route.

Same calculator, your inputs. Add passengers, luggage, season, and starting battery for an accurate per-trip estimate.

Open the calculator →
Methodology

Every figure on this page comes from the same calculation engine that powers our homepage calculator — terrain-segmented consumption with weather and weight adjustments. See how it works and the exact formulas.

Inputs are held constant across both vehicles and every route: 2 passengers, light luggage, summer (June–August average temperatures along the corridor), 100% starting battery, normal driving style, no roof box or trailer, 0% battery degradation.

Last computed: 2026-05-27. Vehicle specs from the EVStrada catalog (manufacturer WLTP × 1.18 real-world calibration).