Head-to-head comparison

Abarth 600e Scorpionissima vs Audi A6 Sportback e-tron Performance

Real-world energy use across 7 European routes, using identical inputs (2 passengers, light luggage, summer, full battery, normal driving). Differences are the route's terrain, the vehicle's consumption, and weight — nothing else.

Verdict

Audi A6 Sportback e-tron Performance wins 7/7 routes

Average difference: 15.66 kWh per trip.

Vehicle specifications

SpecAbarth 600e ScorpionissimaAudi A6 Sportback e-tron Performance
Battery (usable)50.8 kWh94.9 kWh
WLTP range331 km709 km
Real-world consumption181 Wh/km158 Wh/km
Curb weight1464 kg2128 kg
Model year(s)20242024

Route-by-route comparison

RouteDistanceAbarth 600e ScorpionissimaAudi A6 Sportback e-tron PerformanceWinnerΔ kWh
Madrid → Barcelona612 km119.4 kWh104.2 kWhB15.2
Madrid → Seville538 km106.1 kWh92.7 kWhB13.4
Paris → Lyon465 km88.5 kWh77.3 kWhB11.2
Berlin → Munich586 km113.3 kWh98.9 kWhB14.4
Rome → Milan583 km113.6 kWh99.2 kWhB14.4
Barcelona → Paris1031 km198.7 kWh173.4 kWhB25.3
Madrid → Lisbon634 km124.1 kWh108.4 kWhB15.7

Standardized inputs across all rows: 2 passengers, light luggage, summer, 100% starting battery, normal driving style. Your actual consumption will vary — calculate for your specific trip →

Compare these for your route.

Same calculator, your inputs. Add passengers, luggage, season, and starting battery for an accurate per-trip estimate.

Open the calculator →
Methodology

Every figure on this page comes from the same calculation engine that powers our homepage calculator — terrain-segmented consumption with weather and weight adjustments. See how it works and the exact formulas.

Inputs are held constant across both vehicles and every route: 2 passengers, light luggage, summer (June–August average temperatures along the corridor), 100% starting battery, normal driving style, no roof box or trailer, 0% battery degradation.

Last computed: 2026-07-22. Vehicle specs from the EVStrada catalog (manufacturer WLTP × 1.18 real-world calibration).