Head-to-head comparison

Maxus 9 vs Mercedes EQB 250

Real-world energy use across 7 European routes, using identical inputs (2 passengers, light luggage, summer, full battery, normal driving). Differences are the route's terrain, the vehicle's consumption, and weight — nothing else.

Verdict

Mercedes EQB 250 wins 7/7 routes

Average difference: 32.04 kWh per trip.

Vehicle specifications

SpecMaxus 9Mercedes EQB 250
Battery (usable)84 kWh66.5 kWh
WLTP range431 km429 km
Real-world consumption230 Wh/km183 Wh/km
Curb weight1964 kg1701 kg
Model year(s)20232022

Route-by-route comparison

RouteDistanceMaxus 9Mercedes EQB 250WinnerΔ kWh
Madrid → Barcelona612 km151.7 kWh120.7 kWhB31.0
Madrid → Seville538 km134.9 kWh107.3 kWhB27.6
Paris → Lyon465 km112.5 kWh89.5 kWhB23.0
Berlin → Munich586 km143.9 kWh114.5 kWhB29.4
Rome → Milan583 km144.4 kWh114.9 kWhB29.5
Barcelona → Paris1031 km252.4 kWh200.8 kWhB51.6
Madrid → Lisbon634 km157.7 kWh125.5 kWhB32.2

Standardized inputs across all rows: 2 passengers, light luggage, summer, 100% starting battery, normal driving style. Your actual consumption will vary — calculate for your specific trip →

Compare these for your route.

Same calculator, your inputs. Add passengers, luggage, season, and starting battery for an accurate per-trip estimate.

Open the calculator →
Methodology

Every figure on this page comes from the same calculation engine that powers our homepage calculator — terrain-segmented consumption with weather and weight adjustments. See how it works and the exact formulas.

Inputs are held constant across both vehicles and every route: 2 passengers, light luggage, summer (June–August average temperatures along the corridor), 100% starting battery, normal driving style, no roof box or trailer, 0% battery degradation.

Last computed: 2026-05-28. Vehicle specs from the EVStrada catalog (manufacturer WLTP × 1.18 real-world calibration).