Head-to-head comparison

BMW iX1 xDrive30 vs Kia e-Niro 39 kWh

Real-world energy use across 7 European routes, using identical inputs (2 passengers, light luggage, summer, full battery, normal driving). Differences are the route's terrain, the vehicle's consumption, and weight — nothing else.

Verdict

Kia e-Niro 39 kWh wins 7/7 routes

Average difference: 12.96 kWh per trip.

Vehicle specifications

SpecBMW iX1 xDrive30Kia e-Niro 39 kWh
Battery (usable)64.7 kWh39 kWh
WLTP range419 km282 km
Real-world consumption182 Wh/km163 Wh/km
Curb weight1674 kg1287 kg
Model year(s)20222018

Route-by-route comparison

RouteDistanceBMW iX1 xDrive30Kia e-Niro 39 kWhWinnerΔ kWh
Madrid → Barcelona612 km120.1 kWh107.5 kWhB12.6
Madrid → Seville538 km106.7 kWh95.6 kWhB11.1
Paris → Lyon465 km89.0 kWh79.7 kWhB9.3
Berlin → Munich586 km113.9 kWh102.0 kWhB11.9
Rome → Milan583 km114.2 kWh102.3 kWhB11.9
Barcelona → Paris1031 km199.8 kWh178.9 kWhB20.9
Madrid → Lisbon634 km124.8 kWh111.8 kWhB13.0

Standardized inputs across all rows: 2 passengers, light luggage, summer, 100% starting battery, normal driving style. Your actual consumption will vary — calculate for your specific trip →

Compare these for your route.

Same calculator, your inputs. Add passengers, luggage, season, and starting battery for an accurate per-trip estimate.

Open the calculator →
Methodology

Every figure on this page comes from the same calculation engine that powers our homepage calculator — terrain-segmented consumption with weather and weight adjustments. See how it works and the exact formulas.

Inputs are held constant across both vehicles and every route: 2 passengers, light luggage, summer (June–August average temperatures along the corridor), 100% starting battery, normal driving style, no roof box or trailer, 0% battery degradation.

Last computed: 2026-07-15. Vehicle specs from the EVStrada catalog (manufacturer WLTP × 1.18 real-world calibration).